Ford Puma common problems & fixes (2019–present, 1.0 EcoBoost mHEV, ST and Gen-E)

Written by the C4R team from DVSA data and owner reports. Fact-checked 2026-10-04.

30-second verdict

The Puma has been one of Britain's best-selling cars, and it's great to drive. Most are 1.0 EcoBoost mild hybrids, and the thing to understand is the oil-pump drive belt that runs inside the engine. It doesn't drive the camshafts on the Puma — those use a chain — but if it degrades, debris can starve the engine of oil. Buy one with a spotless, on-time service history using Ford's specified oil, check the recall list (there are several, mostly software), and it should serve you well.

Generations at a glance

VersionUK yearsEngineGearbox
Puma mHEV2019/2020–present (facelift 2024)1.0 EcoBoost 48V mild hybrid, 125/155ps6-speed manual, 7-speed dual-clutch auto (from 2021)
Puma (non-hybrid)Limited1.0 EcoBoostManual / auto
Puma ST2020–present1.5 EcoBoost three-cylinder (later 1.0 mHEV "ST Powershift")6-speed manual / auto
Puma Gen-E2025–presentElectricSingle speed

Known issues

1. Oil-pump wet belt degradation — Reported by owners; widely covered in UK media

2. Mild-hybrid system faults — Confirmed recalls

3. Engine oil separator — Confirmed recall

4. Fuel line chafing — Confirmed recall

5. Infotainment and camera glitches — Confirmed recalls / reported by owners

Recalls

Check any specific car on the GOV.UK recall service. Puma recalls in the DVSA database include:

DVSA refLaunchedConcern (summary)
R/2020/045Feb 2020Airbag retention springs
R/2020/248Aug 2020Hybrid battery connections not torqued correctly
R/2021/177May 2021eCall software
R/2022/171Apr 2022Engine oil separator damage
R/2022/239Jul 2022eCall module replacement
R/2023/264Sep 2023Restraint system configuration
R/2024/278Jul 2024Instrument cluster software
R/2025/084Mar 2025Fuel line chafing
R/2025/196Jun 2025Hybrid system — BECM software
R/2025/359Sep 2025SYNC 3 rear-view camera software
R/2026/039Feb 2026Restraint control module software
R/2026/064Feb 2026Instrument cluster software
R/2026/165Apr 2026Right-hand front driveshaft inspection
R/2026/181May 2026Telematics control module loss of function

Build dates decide whether a car is affected.

MOT watch-points

What the 2024 DVSA figures say

Most common recorded failure reasons

DVSA failure reasonTestsShare of this model's tests
Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength2121.3%
Tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords1961.2%
Headlamp aim: too high1901.2%
Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid1260.8%
Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively1220.8%

One test can record more than one defect, so the shares must not be added together.

Common advisories to check before buying

Method and limits: C4R calculated these figures from DVSA's anonymised 2024 MOT results. Pass rate is P / (P + F + PRS) for normal Class 4 and 7 tests. Results are de-duplicated by test, low-volume rows are suppressed, and DVSA model labels are standardised into a model family. These figures describe tested cars as a group; they do not predict the condition of one vehicle or prove that every trim and generation performs the same way.

DVSA anonymised MOT tests and results · Open Government Licence v3.0

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT tests and results, 2024.

Buying one? Our checklist

Sources & further reading

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

See Ford Puma cars for sale on C4R